Henry Journal of Nanoscience Nanomedicine & Nanobiology

The author describes in a complete and comprehensive manner the newly invented scientific magnetic designs and constructions that occur throughout the technology that is introduced in his world patent WO2013136097A4 bearing the title: “Magnetic system of three interactions”. The technology comprises a magnetic system performing three or five interactions (8X2=16), however, this is expanded and seven, nine, eleven and thirteen interactions are accomplished and shown (48X2=96). As an application, the magnetic system initially produces magnetic phenomena and interactions, such as the production of three or in other cases five different interactions and also their related three or five opposites, depending on the distance existing between the confronted magnetic constructions. These multiple interactions occur for the first time in the state of the art between confronted magnetic constructions, where there, only one interaction has been observed up to now. The magnetic system is a fully systemized product that can be used as an experimental instrument by everyone interested, to exploit the newly developed designing/ constructing possibilities in the magnetic/electromagnetic products. This need for “magnetic containment” is successfully solved by this invention. While the well-known like and unlike polarity are still here and they will always be around, they have been enriched by an additional more than 96 different polarities causing more than 96 different interactions and types of magnetic fields, making also possible in many different designs the 100% homogenized magnetic field. “Like-unlike” and “unlike-like” polarities are now formed causing newly-observed “stable balance” and “unstable balance” interactions and much more… The inventor-author, invited as an honorable speaker of “special session”, presented with experiments his invention “Magnetic System of Multiple Interactions” at the 2nd International Conference on Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Budapest, on September 24, 2018.

Kertsopoulos invention; Magnetic interactions; Magnetism; Magnetism restrictions; Multiple interactions; Polarities

More than 96 completely new types of polarities and interactions are performed by the “Kertsopoulos invention of multiple interactions” which is world patented in more than 11 countries [1-11]. Instead of observing one single interaction between confronted interacting magnetic constructions, we can construct multiple polarities interchangeable according to the distance between the constructions and thus obtain interchangeable multiple interactions as a result of the interchanging polarities. Confronted interacting constructions are repelling each other with like polarity at the greater distance and when they come closer they strongly attract each other and at the critical distance where the poles are “unlike-like” simultaneously, they rest in“unstable balance”. The state of the art does not possess three interactions according to the variable distance, cannot interchange the polarity and hence the interactions and cannot possess “unlike-like” poles simultaneously as a polarity.

Also, the opposite to the above three occurs with a change of the polarity in the constructions’ symmetry and at the greater distance we can observe the constructions strongly attracting each other and when they come closer they strongly repel each other having an air gap unable to unite and at the critical distance where the poles are “like-unlike” simultaneously, they rest in “stable balance”. The state of the art cannot possess “like-unlike” poles simultaneously as a polarity. Furthermore, the three interactions with their opposites can be constructed with two more interactions and become 5 and if we keep on adding two, they become 7 or 9 or 11 or 13 interactions and even more. New principles in magnetism are introduced [12-14].

The constructional inventive step of the invention, figures 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 show the inventive step of the invention, which is the core and the common application in all applications of the method, and depict the manner by which the invention exploits and makes useful all the polar properties of the loops of the magnetic lines, and each dipole used in the arrangements, in one or the other way, makes use of this inventive step of the construction.

Figure 1 shows every specific in magnetic vector and direction part of the loop (8) of a dipole (7), in the front bundle of dynamic lines (3), two poles corresponding to every two loops, which poles regard the two poles (1, 2) of the dipole (7) and also in front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4), which is in the neutral zone of the magnet (5), where there two other beneficial poles are present, which correspond to each bundle of loops of the neutral zone (8, 5) and are of opposite polarity from their respective adjacent front poles of the same loop. The term “beneficial pole” is used in the sense that in the interactions of the applications of the invention it functions in the same way and with the same properties as a conventional pole with two loops. In every planar theorized surface (6) that cuts vertically every loop of the magnetic lines, exactly at the points where the magnetic lines curve leaving every polar area (3) and are located in the named neutral zone (5) of the magnet, every magnetic line has an opposite vector and direction from what each one had at its neighboring polar area (3). All lines at that planar theorized surface (6) that cuts there vertically the magnetic lines are of opposite polarity from the neighboring pole (3) they belong. We name then, these dynamic lines, specifically for their recognizable identification as front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4).

This bundle is also in that area (6) always of opposite polarity than the adjacent pole (3), in which these are also present and differ from this part of the dynamic lines coming from the adjacent polar region (3) and which for their recognizable identification are particularly designated as front bundle of dynamic lines (3). At the north (1) pole (3) of a dipole (7), which is designated as front bundle of dynamic lines (3), the adjacent front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4) coming from a perpendicularly considered level (6) jointly from the two adjacent loops (8) (8) of the neutral zone (5) are of south polarity (2) and this as (4, 2) is identical to the south (2) pole (3) of the dipole (7). The respective applies to the south (2) pole (3) of the same dipole (7), which is also designated as front bundle of dynamic lines (3) and the adjacent front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4), which comes from a vertically considered level (6) jointly from the two adjacent loops (8) (8) of the neutral zone (5) is of north (1) polarity (4,1) and is identical to the north (1) pole (3) of the dipole (7). Because then of the fact that every dipole (7) has two poles (3, 1 and 3, 2) the invention exploits construction wise the areas (5) of every loop (8) of every dipole (7), utilizing the differentiation that the dynamic lines attain in their magnetic vector and direction in space, when they penetrate in the neutral zone (5) of the magnet (7) so that every dipole (7) has two poles (3, 1 and 3, 2) but every loop (8) of the dipole (7) possesses two more beneficially exploited construction wise polarities (4, 1) and (4, 2).

Figure 2 shows a second case, wherein due to the nature of magnetism and since the dynamic lines always select the closest and easiest way or means to pass through both magnetic materials that are nearby to close a magnetic loop (8A) as dynamic lines, these corresponding results are achieved by positioning a dipole (9) in marginal adjacent rear position from a front dipole (7), where the front pole of the rear dipole (9) is of the same polarity, meaning north (1) with the rear polarity of the front dipole (7) and one front bundle of the dynamic lines (8A) of the rear dipole (9), unifies with the bundle of dynamic lines of the loop of the front dipole (7) so that a single and uniform loop of magnetic lines (8A) is formed that penetrates both dipoles (7, 9). If the front bundle of dynamic lines (3, 2) is designated as the one coming from the front dipole (7), then the total front bundle of the rear dipole (9) will be designated as front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4A, 1), executing the similar operations as in the first case of figure 1 (4, 1), referred to above as one dipole (7) only, with the exception that the front/rear bundle (4A, 1) is emitted from the front bundle of dynamic lines of the rear positioned dipole (9). The front/rear bundle of dynamic lines (4), of any polarity, is emitted spherically in the three-dimensional space from a cylindrical dipole and thus, as long as the application exploits this property of the dipoles.

Continue reading...